| « Churches just crossed the line | I do not like to hear good news » |
Here's a nice little soft-core gun porn video (with thanks to EckerNet).
Now here is the gun control equivalent to goatse:
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Wednesday that having more guns on college campuses is not the way to prevent campus violence like the massacre at Virginia Tech.
Since the April 16 shootings that left 33 people dead, including the gunman, at Virginia Tech, some have suggested that the carnage might have been lower if a student or professor with a gun had stepped in.
"I don't think that is the answer quite frankly," said Gonzales, who was participating in a governor's task force to study safety and security on Oklahoma college campuses. source
Then what IS the answer?
Instead, authorities should enforce existing laws concerning the ownership and use of handguns, he said.
Okay fucktard pay attention: Cho bought his guns legally and used them illegally. If anyone in the vicinity of the shootings had a concealed carry permit and was not packing it is because they respected the law that removed from them the opportunity to defend their life. And the lives of others. Think about it okay? The shooter broke the law. The victims did not. Any questions on the difference between "law abiding citizens follow the law" and "criminals do not follow the law"?
"We can't guarantee complete security," Gonzales said. "We need to see what we can do as a government - on the federal level, on the state level - to ensure the safety of our students."
He said the government also needs to work closely to make campuses safe while still respecting individual freedoms and privacy.
This makes no sense. The government "can't guarantee complete security" so the government needs to see what they can do to ensure safety? But you can't! You just said you can't, and a side effect of the constitutional right to bear arms is that we can protect ourselves from criminals, so what the fuck is wrong with "concealed carry means it's cool to carry concealed"?
"In a society where we really value individual freedom and respect privacy we're also concerned about public safety," Gonzales said.
We "really value individual freedom" and "we're also concerned about public safety". Which one sounds like the more important issue? The one we "really value" or the one we're "concerned about"? I'm gonna go with "really value", but obviously fucktard sees things differently. How can people be so blind?
A blog post titled "gun porn" should have naked chicks with guns, especially when it says "nsfw"!
Look the answer to gun violence isn't more guns. Likewise, the answer to an SUV driven into school kids isn't more SUVs. Banning guns or SUVs isn't the answer either by the way. Gun violence is emotionally charged for some reason. My dad used to freak out on the idea of riding a motorcycle because a friend of his died in a motorcycle wreck. This was a man who served in war, but didn't bat an eyelash when I enlisted in the military, so to him "motorcycles" was an emotional issue. Guns, for some reason, have become the embodiment of 'evil instrument' in our pansified America. Why? I don't know. All I know is that the government can not - simply can not - keep the streets of the USA safe. It's flat-out impossible because those will ill intentions will find a way to perpetrate their foul deeds.
The first amendment to the US Constitution says the government won't support any one religion and that we can worship as we see fit. It also says we can speak our minds and have public gatherings without restriction. Oh and the press won't be muzzled. Obviously, being Number One, these are very important limitations on the government! Make no mistake here: these are limitations on our federal government. Rules saying what THEY can't do. Read it and you'll see it limits the government's power to stomp on our rights.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Clearly the second amendment is only slightly less important than the first one, else it would have been first or fifth or ... not exist at all. So what does Number Two say?
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The same word that grants us the right to peaceably assemble is used here: people. Not persons, not states, not the government: people. Way back then, and do the research if you doubt it, but way back then it was because the founding fathers knew full fucking well we wouldn't have beat the British if the common man wasn't in a position (meaning armed) to overthrow the government. Our right to bear arms is constitutionally protected BECAUSE government gets it's power from people who can take that power away. With guns. Defending myself and my community against people like Cho is a side effect of that right.
Check out The Jawa Report for the #1 google response for gun porn. Nice info. Convinces me my next pistol will be a fortyfive. Not really interested in the Mossberg though. Still got the hots for an Extrema2 twelve gauge.
An armed law-abiding citizen is a threat only to a criminal, and a corrupt government.
To me the answer is simple, but implementation of it - given our current anti-gun sentiment - is almost impossible. Gun safety education is paramount, as is gun responsibility. We all know we have the right to free speech, and we know that doesn't mean it's okay to yell "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater. That would be irresponsible to say the least. We teach driver education in high school, and rightly so. People need to learn to drive. But we don't teach ANYTHING about how to enjoy our constitutionally protected rights. How to be responsible with them. We should have concealed carry permits that are as easy to obtain - and revoked as rarely - as a license to operate a motor vehicle. High schools should teach students enough gun safety that they could probably pass a reasonable test on the subject. Same with how to be a smart voter, and what freedom of speech means. Actually I'd be in favor of licensing for gun ownership in general, with advancing levels of the license allowing for various forms of hunting and ultimately concealed carry. Once you have the right to concealed carry the government should not arbitrarily take it away from you based on physical location. You personally might lose that right, but not because you are walking into a post office. Or a government-funded educational facility. I could see banning firearms in a court room, but not a school or a police station. The cops should not fear me walking in with a pistol on my hip because the cops should not fear me at all! Wait till I draw okay? And if I'm stupid enough to draw on the law I'll get what I got coming to me.
Private property is an odd one because the rights of the landowner are paramount, but Luby's would NOT have been as bad if they didn't have their damned "no guns" policy. So that's a hard place to think on. Maybe "private property that is a residence" is where the landowner can lay down the law, meaning businesses can suck ass if they want to deny me a right. That sounds cool.
Unfortunately because of the extreme emotional state people get in over guns it'll never happen. Even though I'm in favor of a reasonable and realistic licensing program I'll never vote for such a thing because the anti-gun nuts will see it as a first step towards banning those instruments of evil. Gun confiscation won't be but a few steps behind banning. Fuck that: you can take 'em when I can't use 'em no more. :guns:
EDIT: Holy crap! A link at the bottom of a post on fleshbot and suddenly my poor server is working triple-time to keep it up. Normally that much traffic so quickly means 'spammer' but it's not - it's real traffic from a real website with a real link. And a website with lots of boobies! Hooray for lots of boobies!!!
![]()
I'm sure my traffic won't even be a drop in the bucket compared to Fleshbot's, but I linked you too. You put together a good post. It needs to be read. The pictures don't hurt any, either.:rolleyes:
You guys are awesome! Long live the NRA our 2nd amendment. Thank you. Very politically sexy!